Did a Duck Dynasty star Punk So Tawny Phil piss people off by actually thinking in public?
How retro to still believe in God and sex for procreation not recreation. Of course, all sex organs are really delicious reusable food, and the a-hole is dessert :) It was blind evolution that put the recreation center right next to the garbage dump, not design :) I'm surprised that gays want the right to be married when they should be demanding that marriage be outlawed, and the couples separated and handed off to gays and lesbians for retraining :) So why stop there? Why not sex between kids, and between kids and adults? Between parents and children? Or let's go the other way, legalizing group and open marriages between people of all ages, imagine the new work for lawyers, accountants, and IRS agents :)
And why any laws against open nudity and sex in public? What a waste to pay money to see professional athletes when the same money could pay admission to a mass orgy :) Who is this God a-hole anyway? Even the Muslim god limits men to four wives at a time, and won't let women have more than one hubby, much less same-sex marriage. Maybe Joseph Smith was right and a man should be able to have 40 wives if he can sign them up, ask that federal judge about religious freedom :) Yes, a woman with 40 wives, I'd like to see that TV show :) Why even worry about procreation anymore when the world is overcrowded? And if we just wait another 20 years, science will make us all immortal anyway, ask Kurzweil, forget about them horrible gay deaths from AIDS, they were a blip in time :) Maybe any kids that get through the birth control and abortion gauntlet and are born by accident can be devoted to child sacrifice to Baal, that federal judge would back up that right to religious freedom in a second :) I like Jonathan Swift's proposal to sell tender infants as food :)
On second thought, the public still isn't ready for open thinking on this subject, are they?
My reply:
ReplyDeleteDid a Duck Dynasty star Punk So Tawny Phil piss people off by actually thinking in public?
How retro to still believe in God and sex for procreation not recreation. Of course, all sex organs are really delicious reusable food, and the a-hole is dessert :) It was blind evolution that put the recreation center right next to the garbage dump, not design :) I'm surprised that gays want the right to be married when they should be demanding that marriage be outlawed, and the couples separated and handed off to gays and lesbians for retraining :) So why stop there? Why not sex between kids, and between kids and adults? Between parents and children? Or let's go the other way, legalizing group and open marriages between people of all ages, imagine the new work for lawyers, accountants, and IRS agents :)
And why any laws against open nudity and sex in public? What a waste to pay money to see professional athletes when the same money could pay admission to a mass orgy :) Who is this God a-hole anyway? Even the Muslim god limits men to four wives at a time, and won't let women have more than one hubby, much less same-sex marriage. Maybe Joseph Smith was right and a man should be able to have 40 wives if he can sign them up, ask that federal judge about religious freedom :) Yes, a woman with 40 wives, I'd like to see that TV show :) Why even worry about procreation anymore when the world is overcrowded? And if we just wait another 20 years, science will make us all immortal anyway, ask Kurzweil, forget about them horrible gay deaths from AIDS, they were a blip in time :) Maybe any kids that get through the birth control and abortion gauntlet and are born by accident can be devoted to child sacrifice to Baal, that federal judge would back up that right to religious freedom in a second :) I like Jonathan Swift's proposal to sell tender infants as food :)
On second thought, the public still isn't ready for open thinking on this subject, are they?
http://historyscopers-gay-watch.blogspot.com/